← All Posts
Before you try audiclip, let’s set expectations. Some things it does brilliantly. Some things it doesn’t do at all.
Not a podcast production tool. If you want to produce a polished podcast for an audience — with custom intros, editing, voice cloning, and branded segments — use Wondercraft or record yourself. audiclip generates daily podcasts from articles automatically. There’s no production workflow.
Not a text-to-speech reader. It doesn’t read articles word-for-word. Two AI hosts discuss the ideas conversationally. They skip boilerplate, highlight what matters, and ask clarifying questions. If you want verbatim reading, use Speechify.
Not NotebookLM. It doesn’t let you upload documents and interactively Q&A with AI hosts. If you need deep analysis of one specific document with follow-up questions, use NotebookLM.
Not a replacement for reading. Some articles need visual reading — code tutorials, infographic-heavy pieces, visual designs. audiclip is for the articles that are ideas-and-arguments, not visual content.
Not a news aggregator. It doesn’t recommend articles to you. It only covers what YOU save. No algorithm. No curation beyond your own taste.
Not real-time. It generates daily, not on-demand. Save today, listen tomorrow. If you need something read aloud right now, use Speechify or browser TTS.
A daily habit. Save articles → listen to a podcast tomorrow morning. Automatic. No decisions per article.
Two conversational hosts. Not a single voice reading. A discussion where the second host asks your questions for you.
Cross-language. Save in any of 100+ languages. Listen in yours. The world’s articles, in your language.
Standard RSS. Listen in whatever podcast app you already use.
Public stations. Your curation becomes a podcast others can subscribe to.
If you save 5+ articles a day and wish you could keep up, audiclip is for you. If you need to deeply analyze one document, it’s not. Both use cases are valid — they’re just different tools.
Know what you’re getting. Then get it.